"When companies use their legal department as a profit center it is highly indicative that the products they claim they are incorporated to provide are no longer competitive in the marketplace," he said. ![]() Paul Berg, a software licensing consultant, expressed concern about Oracle's software license auditing practices in an email to The Register. And a Reddit post from earlier this month says as much. ![]() Another Reddit post from a year ago tells the same story. A recently deleted Reddit post, preserved presently in Google's web cache, contains a similar anecdote. Palmer's experience appears not to be unique either. Woodard said that while Oracle was within its rights to go after license violators, it ought to be sure it's invoicing the right people. "Normally, when we see Oracle say these IP addresses have downloaded this software, we haven't seen it get to the point where they send them a bill." "It seems like a fishing expedition," Woodard said. In a phone interview with The Register, David Woodard, COO of House of Brick Technologies, a Nebraska-based IT consultancy, said normally when a company sends another a bill, there's usually some sort of agreement or contract between them. ![]() Having that data would make it easier for Oracle to target payment demands.Īnd Palmer is not alone in that suspicion. He said he wonders whether Oracle's demand might be a fishing expedition to get Merula to cough up customer data, similar to the scattershot legal demands that music companies in the past directed at ISPs to get the identities of subscribers sharing copyrighted music.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |